Friday, March 13, 2015

Needs to Stop

‘IT NEEDS TO STOP’
'St. Louis Post-Dispatch' - 2015-03-13
ST. LOUIS OFFICER DESCRIBES AFTERMATH OF BOY’S SHOOTING
We arrived at the Children’s Hospital emergency room at the same time.
He and his partner parked, and I pulled up to their left and did the same. I got out of my car and watched as the officer hurried from his seat and opened the back, driver’s side door. When the officer grabbed the boy from the back seat of his police Tahoe, I knew almost instantly. There was a split second though, before instantly, I guess, where I didn’t know. For that split second, the officer looked like any dad grabbing his sleeping boy from the car and putting the boy’s head on his shoulder to carry him inside to sleep comfortably in his own bed.
For that split second, it was a sweet moment. The officer, an around-50-year-old white guy, clutched the little boy over his left shoulder gently, but with a clear purpose. The boy was small, a black child with his hair in corn rows and dressed as a typical 5- or 6-year-old dresses.
He reminded me of my own 6-year-old son. The sudden, pained look on the officer’s face and the fact that the boy wasn’t crying or yelling or doing anything other than appearing to be asleep made the split-second fantasy fade away fast. We hurried into the emergency room where we were met by the trauma team and hospital staff. I’m always in awe at how these emergency room doctors and nurses and staff are so able to get to working on a patient so fast. There was some sliver of hope that the boy would make it — at least that’s what we all wanted to believe. The truth, and I think we all knew it, was that this boy would never fall asleep in his own bed again. When the officer laid the boy down on the gurney and stood back upright, any wind that may have been in my sails quickly faded to nothing.
His shirt said it all. Where the boy’s little heart had lain, so close to the officer’s own heart, was a mess that told us things would not end well. The three of us officers, with nearly 50 years of city police experience under our collective belts, waited not so stoically outside of trauma room two as the doctors and nurses busted their tails to save this little guy. We paced and exchanged awkward smiles with each other and the nurses and staff who were passing by. There were several times when one or all of us was close to tears, but we held it together. It was hard for the officer, because he did the best he could and it wasn’t going to be enough. It was hard for me, because I have a son about that age at home and couldn’t imagine anything like this happening to him. It was awkward because we were all hoping, but we also knew that it was going to take a miracle for that boy to live.
He was not granted that miracle. Just like that, at a couple of minutes after 8 p.m., a 6-year-old boy was gone forever. The sheet of paper, which I’ve seen way too many times, verified it. It’s the one with a line printed on it. When it’s completely straight, you’ve died. You’ve straight-lined, as they say.
I was done with being in the hospital. I wanted to leave. To go back to my car, I had to walk past the same group of people who were in the waiting room when we walked past them earlier with the dying boy. Three little boys grabbed at me and asked me if that boy we carried in earlier was dead.
“Did he die, Officer? Was that boy dead?” they asked me. I got no help from their mom, as she was tending to a clearly sick kid of her own.
“Boys, he’s fine. He’s a strong boy, just like you guys.” I felt bad lying, but it seemed easier than having to explain death to three strange kids all under 10 years old. I went to my car and grabbed a bunch of Dum-Dums from the bag I carry around. Mom was cool with me giving them suckers, and they left me alone about the dead boy they thought was still alive. I couldn’t tell them that the boy who was about their same age had straight-lined.
Six-year-olds shouldn’t straight-line.
Why did this one?
Because of gun violence in the city.
The weather was nice so the people were out.
Some people were out with their guns.
Why did this boy have to die?
Was it disrespect?
Drugs?
A woman?
Money? All stupid reasons to fire a gun anywhere near another human being, let alone children, but here we are again, with another child lost to violence.
We tried to save this boy. The officer showed up and there was a hostile crowd of people, most of whom had nothing to do with the shooting, and most not even sure what they should be angry at. The were just angry because anger is easy. Patience is hard. Kindness in the face of adversity is hard. Understanding is hard. Some chose to be angry at the police, while others were taking video on their phones. Meanwhile, nobody was helping a child as he lay dying on the sidewalk from a bullet that had torn through his little body. The officer fought through the angry crowd and put a dying boy he didn’t know in his car.
Did he have to do that?
No. EMS was coming, but they were too far away. It was too risky to wait for them, so we raced that little guy to the hospital in record time. We had all sorts of cars shutting down the route to the hospital, just like we would were a fellow cop shot and in need of medical care. That’s about the highest honor we can give a person, and this boy deserved it.
Still, it didn’t matter on this night.
I truly believe that when it’s your time, it’s your time.
Six years shouldn’t be anyone’s time, but that’s not my call. It’s queer, but I left the hospital and went back in service to handle more calls. I had to handle some subsequent calls with a little dead boy freshly on my mind. That’s the thing with policing. It never ends. You have to carry on, so I pretended to care about a car accident and a stolen bike when I just wanted to shout in their faces, “AT LEAST YOU DIDN’T DIE AT 6 YEARS OLD FROM A BULLET THROUGH YOUR CHEST!!! I HAVE NO INTEREST IN YOUR (expletive deleted) PROBLEMS RIGHT NOW!”
But that’s not professional. I’m wrapping this up having finished a six-pack of Bud Light Lime and I just kissed all three of my own sleeping kids as well as my wife. I also lay on the ground and wrestled my dogs at 2 a.m., even though one of them is dying and has no interest in playing, and I have to work in the morning. I’m still thinking about a boy I never met alive, and hoping he’s in a better place. I’m looking at my own 6-year-old’s homework folder and wondering if this dead boy has a homework folder in a backpack never to be turned in again. Will his mom see it when she gets home, and cry? Did he have a lunch packed for the next day that will still be in the fridge this weekend to remind his family of a lunch that was never taken to school?
Did he go to kindergarten? Will somebody have to explain to his classmates that they’ll never see this little guy alive again and why?
This is all too sad, and it needs to stop.
Someone please figure out how.
Don Re
EDITOR’S NOTE • St. Louis police Officer Don Re has been on the job for more than 16 years and is currently on patrol in the Sixth District. He wrote this essay on Wednesday night. It first appeared on his personal blog, donofalltrades.com, updated here to reflect the boy was 6, not 5. Re, 42, is married and has three children: a daughter, 11; a son, 6; and another son, 3. Said Re: “I never wanted to write about work, but I’ve found it to be cathartic for me, and the stories have been my best-received.’’

Copyright STLtoday.com. All rights 
reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Wednesday, March 11, 2015

Ryan Hummert

Maplewood City Council Tuesday approved a resolution to accept a bid for construction of the Ryan Hummert Memorial in Ryan Hummert Memorial Park. The memorial will be situated near the picnic shelter, above the softball field.

Delong Landscape Architecture did the design work; Brookside Contracting will build the memorial. The cost is not to exceed $334,471. All of the money raised to date and in the future for the Ryan Hummert Memorial are going to pay for the memorial. City funds are also being used, according to City Manager Marty Corcoran.

Tuesday, March 3, 2015

PD

Position Announcement

POLICE OFFICER

RICHMOND HEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT

Starting Salary:  $49,364

Pay Grade:  6

This is a full-time, benefit-eligible position which includes a full range of benefits including paid vacation, paid sick leave, paid holidays, tuition reimbursement, and employee health, dental, life, disability, and pension programs.

JOB DESCRIPTION:

Performs duties to protect life and property, including patrol, conveyance, investigation, service, and enforcement functions, or special response team officers.  A full job description is available here.

REQUIREMENTS:

Successful candidates will perform the duties of basic patrolman.  Applicants must be 21 years old, possess a valid Drivers License and a Bachelor’s Degree from an accredited college or university.  State of Missouri Class A P.O.S.T. Certification (640 hours) from an accredited Public Safety Academy is also required.

TO APPLY:  

Submit a City of Richmond Heights online employment application and a signed copy of the job description either as an attachment in the online application, in-person, by mail, or via fax.  Applications are available at http://richmondheights.applicantpro.com/jobs/.  College transcripts and verification of P.O.S.T. certification are required (scanned copies may be included as an attachment in the online application).  No exceptions will be made.


Application deadline is:  Tuesday, March 24, 2015

Testing for this position is slated for Tuesday, April 7, 2015, at 6:00 p.m.


The City of Richmond Heights is an equal opportunity employer.  In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City will provide reasonable accommodations to qualified individuals with disabilities and encourages both prospective and current employees to discuss potential accommodations with the employer.  The City of Richmond Heights is a drug and alcohol free work place.  A pre-employment drug screen and background check is required for all positions.  Additional pre-employment testing may be required for certain positions.

It is the policy of the City of Richmond Heights not to discriminate on the basis of age, race, color, marital status, national origin, political affiliation, religion, sex or disability except where specific age, sex or physical requirement constitute a bona fide occupational qualification.

EOE/AA/M/F/D/V

Hockey